• Vote in the poll !
  • Write articles or help in researching
    Join the discussion !
  • Vegetarian Arguments

    Reasons for a vegetarian diet

    Vegetarianism. Is described in the dictionary as a “diet excluding all meat and fish,”
    But to the vegetarian, it is so much more.
    Some progress towards vegetarianism because of concern for their health or perhaps to regain their health lost.
    Some go towards the diet out of conscience.
    Perhaps the karma given off by a diet which lessens suffering is one to be admonished as self-serving, but to follow ones heart is the ultimate of divine choices.
    Thomas A. Edison once said; “Non-violence leads to the highest ethics, which is the goal of all evolution.
    Until we stop harming all other living beings, we are still savages.”

    Health Reason
    Money Reason
    Ethics Reason
    Environment Reason


    Health Reason back

    Most people look at Vegetarianism and Veganism with scorn.
    They have been led to believe that eating meat and drinking milk are both necessary for stronger bones and bigger muscles.
    But this couldn’t be farther from the truth.
    Numerous studies done by several universities and organizations have shown that reducing your animal protein intake will raise calcium levels much more then simply consuming more calcium.
    Thus, Vegans get plenty of calcium by simply not needing the calcium.
    I think the dangers of eating meat are obvious and if not I would gladly write about them.

    Vegetarians are said to live longer by various studies including:
      Adventist Mortality (California, 1959-60)
      Health Food Shoppers (UK, 1973-79)
      Adventist Health (California, 1976-80)
      Heidelberg (Germany, 1978-81)
      Oxford Vegetarian (UK, 1980-84)
      EPIC-Oxford (UK, 1993-2001)

    As Dr. Charles Attwood pointed out, this is insane: If people were being run down by trucks at the same rate that they’re dying from meat-and-dairy-induced heart attacks, something would be done.
    According to Dr. William Castelli, chair of the Nutrition Department at Harvard Medical School and the researcher who has directed the longest-running clinical trial in history, “A low-fat, plant-based diet would … lower the cancer rate 60 percent.”

    Money Reasonback

    The economical (ecological would fit into the environmental part I believe) pieces to this puzzle are not so obvious.
    I would say that most adults in the US have complained over taxes.
    Some even have gotten to the point of voting NO on every tax increase.
    You may ask where all that money could be going, right?
    Well, what if I told you it was paying for your hamburgers?
    Please, allow me to explain. Farms all across the U.S. use a great deal of water to feed animals and grow crops.
    And since livestock consumes 80% of the corn we grow and over 95% of the oats.
    Now, you may believe that you pay for this at the cash register when you buy your ham.
    But that is not true, you see, Farms could simply not afford to stay in business if they had to pay full price for water.
    Instead, the government subsidizes their water; this takes money out of your wallet! -If the cost of water needed to produce a pound of meat were not subsidized, the cheapest hamburger meat would cost more than $35 a pound! - (1)
    The thing to also to consider if you live in an area like the N.W. United States is that many of us receive our power from a as= series of dams in the Columbia River (hydropower).
    What many people in the US and even in Oregon where I live do not know is why we pay such high electricity bills even with such an abundant resource.
    The problem isn’t what you might think. You see, Farms get their water from that very river, but they get it upstream from the dams.
    Now, you may think this couldn’t be much water, -but meat production amounts for over half of the water consumed in the entire region- (2). Thus, the river is drained of water and they are left in their current situation of high electricity prices and searching relying on the use of Nuclear Power.

     

    Ethics Reason back

    While Morals are a human conception, this gives no man the right to deny that animals are deserving of said rights.
    The basis of all morals center around the Golden Rule.
    This rule basically states that one should only treat another with the same respect and care that they would hope to get in return.
    Now the question is weather this should apply to animals since they cannot follow this rule.
    Every major religion on Earth teaches mercy and compassion, how can one make the separation of these terms to animals?
    Many religions even advocate vegetarianism.
    "To become vegetarian is to step into the stream which leads to nirvana."
    --Buddha

     

    Environment back

    Let me start with a story.
    One day I was in the back seat of the car on a drive over the mountain, from the way this story was told to me, I was three years old.
    As we came over a ridge, all of the trees disappear.
    All that is left is stumps as far as the eye could see. Clear cutting.
    At this age my destiny was told, I went hysterical, screaming and reaching for the door trying to get to the woods and fight (no one was there, but I was 3).
    In the car that day my sister and mother made a friendly wager over at what age I would be arrested for protesting.
    Mom said before 18 and my sister said 21. I turned 18 last month so mom is losing.
    -More than 60% of Americans describe themselves as active environmentalists or sympathetic to the environment- (3) I would be willing to bet that the numbers of people who care about the environment are much higher.
    While considering how grossly inefficient it is to cycle grains and crops through animals you fail to see the next side to wasting crops.
    Land isn’t fertile forever; eventually erosion will destroy the land.
    75% of all U.S. topsoil has been lost to date.
    Eighty-five percent of this loss is directly related to livestock grazing.
    In the U.S. More than 260 million acres of U.S. forest have been cleared to create cropland in order to produce our meat-centered diet. -Fifty-five square feet of tropical rainforest is consumed to produce every quarter-pound of rainforest beef. -(4)
    If the forests don’t concern you, then maybe your water will.
    In December 1997, the Senate Agricultural Committee released a report that stated that animals raised for food produce 130 times as much excrement as the entire human population, roughly 68,000 pounds per second, all without the benefit of waste treatment systems.
    Where do you think that waste goes?
    It may not be as pleasant but believe that much of that makes it to the ground water.

    By David Aaron Usher

    Footnotes:
    (1) Diet for a new America By John Robbins
    (2) Vegetarian Times January 1985
    (3) http://www.state.gov/g/oes/rls/rm/2004/30060.htm
    (4) http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/2062/argu.HTML#III2
     

    Minoesj : An Animal Voice
    Bringing animal rights closer. And giving a vegetarian, vegan or fruitarian alternative.